Cases 1 - 10 of 957
Hladky v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hladky
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Jackson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Staton v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Staton, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Case v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Andrew Case
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Luczynski v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Luczynski
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Truelove v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Truelove
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Salem v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv05738
Plaintiff:
Clodia Awwad Salem
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McGee v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Andrew Case v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-2379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW CASE
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Rodgers v. Saul
as 3:2021cv01534
Plaintiff:
Cedric Rodgers
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
