Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Native Village of Unalakleet et al v. United States Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Native Village of Unalakleet and Native Village of Elim
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service and Andrew Berke
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hampton v. Woodmen et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Jonathan Woodmen, Kerry Corass, Katholyn Runnels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Cockrell et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
James Cockrell, Andrew Gault, Richard Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Tom'e et al
as 3:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Carol B. Tom'e, Helena Keeney, Robert Bressler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denty vs. ASRC Energy Services - Houston Contracting Company, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard and Evan Denty
Defendant:
Andrew Irvin and ASRC Energy Services - Houston Contracting Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Polt v. Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Polt
Defendant:
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Mousseau et al v. Crum et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mousseau and Randall Wolffe
Defendant:
Adam Crum and Nic Dehart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bickar v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Brian Andrew Bickar
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kamkoff et al v. Hedberg
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Della Kamkoff, John Andrew, Kayla Birch and others
Defendant:
Heidi Hedberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
