Cases 81 - 90 of 142
Holmes et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2016cv01549
Plaintiff:
Douglas Holmes and Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Department of Homeless Service/Human Resources Administration and New York City Comptroller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Libertarian Party of Erie County et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2015cv00654
Plaintiff:
Libertarian Party of Erie County, Michael Kuzma, Richard Cooper and others
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Eric T. Schneiderman, Joseph A. D'Amico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. State of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04674
Plaintiff:
Baxter Aziz Bey
Defendant:
State of New York and Andrew M. Cuomo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rossito-Canty et al v. Cuomo
as 1:2015cv00568
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gilder, Matthew J. Mari, David Pascarella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Montgomery v. Cuomo et al
as 6:2014cv06709
Plaintiff:
Donald Montgomery
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Michael C. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. State of New York et al
as 1:2014cv09594
Plaintiff:
Lance Jackson
Defendant:
State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loyd v. Cuomo et al
as 8:2014cv00829
Plaintiff:
David Loyd
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, George E. Pataki, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Schenk v. National Grid
as 14-1751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carolyn Schenk
Defendant - Appellee:
National Grid, Michael Boyle, Wayne Schechter, National Grid, Director Customer Meter Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02674
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
