Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kotevski (PS) v. Du et al
as 1:2026cv02146
Defendant:
Lilly Winschester, Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, Miranda Du and others
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kotevski v. Bush et al
as 2:2025cv02212
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski and Miki Kotevski
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Hillary Rodman Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Halpern v. Powell et al
as 3:2025cv50461
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Halpern
Defendant:
Chair Jerome H Powell, Governor Lisa D Cook, President Joseph R Biden, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
In re: Kotevski
as 25-4094
Petitioner:
In re: MILAN MICHAEL KOTEVSKI
Respondent:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv03383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
In re: Kotevski
as 25-4016
Petitioner:
In re: MILAN MICHAEL KOTEVSKI
Respondent:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
Lang v. Clinton
as 25-126
Plaintiff:
JASON WILLIAM LANG
Defendant:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, ANDREW M. CUOMO, BARACK OBAMA and others
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 2:2024cv00622
Defendant:
Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, Alphabet Inc., Cox Communication Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abulkhair v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 24-1781
Plaintiff:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JAMES B. COMEY, JR. and others
Nathaniel Washington v. Andrew McCabe et al
as 2:2024cv03661
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
Andrew McCabe, Julio Martinez and Valerie Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
