Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Jones v. Parmley
as 16-3603
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ninham Fish Coleman, Joseph Coleman as Administrator of Estate, agent of Joseph Coleman, Gabrielle Misener, Marissa Horton, AKA Marissa Hunt and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nadine O'Field / Ganonhweih, FKA Nadine Bucktooth
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Andrew Jones, Robert E. Bucktooth, Jr., Cheryl Bucktooth and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Stonehorse Goeman, Marie Peters, Wealthy Bucktooth, Individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James J. Parmley, George Beach, Pamela J. Morris and others
Defendant:
James W. McMahon, Superintendent of New York State Police, in his official and personal capacity, County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Moses v. Spies et al
as 1:2016cv07920
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moses
Defendant:
Daniel Spies and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wultz et al v. Bank of China Ltd
as 1:2014mc00246
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Wultz , Yekutiel Wultz , Amanda Wultz and others
Defendant:
Bank of China Ltd
Movant:
State of Israel
Intervenor:
Rivka Martha Moriah , Atara Nesia Moriah , David Moriah and others
Interpleader_plaintiff:
David Anidzar
Moriah et al v. The Bank of China Limited
as 1:2012cv01594
Plaintiff:
Naftali Andrew Moses, O.S., Minor, Yaakov Shitrit and others
Defendant:
The Bank of China Limited
Not Yet Classified:
Estate of Yonadav Hirshfeld, Dr. Joseph Ciechanover and Eric Cantor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adduci v. 575 Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Frank Adduci
Defendant:
575 Associates, Inc., Henry & Williams Company, Inc., Andrew Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Gomez et al v. William Moses Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv09585
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Gomez, Gilbert Gomez, Roberto Gomez and others
Defendant:
William Moses Co., Inc., Andrew Moses and John Does # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
