Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sanchez et al v. Hyper Structure Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv04524
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Vasquez Baca, Banny Ramos, Oscar Martinez and others
Defendant:
Hyper Structure Corp., Mohammad Rahman and Willie Trescly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vasquez v. USA
as 2:2017cv07000
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Angel Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vasquez v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv04434
Plaintiff:
Luis Angel Vasquez
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gomez et al v. D & J Concrete Corp. et al
as 7:2015cv08706
Plaintiff:
Fernando Gomez and Angel Vasquez
Defendant:
D & J Concrete Corp. and Jack Pereira
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vasquez v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv07526
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Angel Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vasquez v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv07526
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Angel Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mata v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2013cv07405
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Sergeant Angel Vasquez
Plaintiff:
Kenya Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abraham et al v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
as 2:2009cv02096
Plaintiff:
Ilan Abraham, Edgardo Acosta Garcia, Ildefonso Acosta Garcia and others
Defendant:
Entrepreneur Media, Inc. and Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Vasquez v. United Parcel Service (New York), Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03773
Plaintiff:
Angel Vasquez
Defendant:
United Parcel Service (New York), Inc., Danny Cameron and Carlos J. Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
