Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gregory Robinson v. Angelina DeAllie, et al
as 20-1391
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT WILFRED BECKLES, CORPORAL SERGEANT ANGELINA DEALLIE and SERGEANT VERONICA DOWNING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY F. ROBINSON
London v. Members of the Gender Dysphoria Consultation Group et al
as 1:2019cv01518
Defendant:
Sergeant Angelina DeAllie, Deputy Warden Philip Parker, Sergeant "John" Abernathy and others
Plaintiff:
Kamilla London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Gregory Robinson v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 15-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY F. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER CARL C. DANBERG, LT. TRADER, LT. MARK D. DAUM and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
WARDEN PERRY PHELPS, MAJOR SCAROBOROUGH, STAFF LT. KAREN HAWKINS and others
Resop v. Ficliola et al
as 1:2015cv00626
Plaintiff:
Ryan Matthew Resop
Defendant:
Anthony A. Ficliola, Gregory E. Smith, Thomson Reuters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Baker et al
as 1:2014cv00891
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Hunt
Defendant:
Baker, Angelina DeAllie and G. Farrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2013cv00497
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Stanford Henry, Wilfred Beckles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Biggins v. Little et al
as 1:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. Little et al
as 1:2011cv00411
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Thorpe
Defendant:
Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
