Cases 11 - 20 of 93
ANGULO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH ANGULO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leones v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Luis Angulo Leones
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Victoria-Angulo v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00611
Petitioner:
Edier Victoria-Angulo
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Angulo v. Tesla, Inc
as 1:2022cv22607
Defendant:
Tesla, Inc, Tesla Florida, Inc. and Stanford Blake
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dillon Angulo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Angulo v. Workhorse Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv22489
Plaintiff:
Reinier Angulo
Defendant:
Workhorse Group, Inc., Utilimaster Corporation, The Shyft Group USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
USA v. Luis Leones, et al
as 22-12456
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS ELIAS ANGULO LEONES and JHONIS ALEXIS LANDAZUR ARBOLEDA
Vitaly Bogomazov v. Ralph Angulo, et al
as 22-11653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VITALY VLADIMIROVICH BOGOMAZOV
Defendant / Appellant:
RALPH ANGULO and GEORGE WILLIAMS
ANGULO v. FIRST SERVICE RESIDENTIAL FLORIDA, INC.
as 1:2022cv20399
Plaintiff:
JULIO ANGULO
Defendant:
FIRST SERVICE RESIDENTIAL FLORIDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ANGULO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ANGULO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
