Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Turner v. Martin et al
as 7:2016cv01596
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Turner
Defendant:
Jason Martin, Commons, Anissa Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Hamby et al
as 4:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Giles
Defendant:
E Hamby, Wilson, Karen Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Giles
Defendant:
E. Hamby, Doctor Wilson, Karen Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luker v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 4:2013cv01568
Plaintiff:
Clarence Luker
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Jean Darbouze, Anissa Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luker v. Corizon Health Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00315
Plaintiff:
Clarence Luker
Defendant:
Anissa Thomas and David Pavlakovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Jonathan Ragan, S. Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brennan v. Thomas et al
as 2:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Brennan
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Carter F Davenport, Joseph H Headley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brennan v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00947
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Brennan
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Carter F. Davenport, Joseph H. Headley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Hooteh et al
as 4:2012cv00799
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
J Hooteh, R Hooteh, W Howard and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Thomas et al
as 4:2010cv00262
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Anissa Thomas, Debra Sanders, David Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
