Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Woods v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Woods
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Kathy Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frost v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jared Dakota Frost
Defendant:
Jennifer Davenport, Byron Oliver, Alan Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Picardi v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01042
Petitioner:
Melissa Anne Picardi
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuc v. Warden Needly
as 7:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Ann Kuc, Auntie and Beth
Respondent:
Warden Needly and Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobs v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Jacobs
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Trey Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuc v. Neely
as 7:2022cv00911
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Ann Kuc
Respondent:
Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robey v. Garrett et al
as 7:2022cv00532
Petitioner:
Jessica Ann Robey
Respondent:
Garrett and Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Chilton County System et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Davis (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00847
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leo Bailey, Sr.
Defendant:
Ann Davis and Chilton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
