Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Gonzalez v. CPK Entertainment LLC, et al.
as 1:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Gonzalez
Defendant:
CPK Entertainment, LLC, Cyrus Kharche and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Maddox v. Foley et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Clarice M Maddox
Defendant:
Mike Foley, Mary Kathrine Huffman, Timothy O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strohm v. The Kroger Company
as 1:2021cv00226
Defendant:
The Kroger Company
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Strohm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Dolan v. Allergan PLC, et al
as 1:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Ms Ann Marie Dolan and Ann M. Dolan
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, INAMED Corporation, Allergan USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 1:2021cv00537
Plaintiff:
Ms Ann Marie Dolan
Defendant:
Allergan Inc. and Allergan inc f/k/a Inamed Corporation and prior to that McGhan Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hof v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00232
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anne Marie Hof
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGoldrick et. al. v. Davol, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2020cv04116
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael McGoldrick and Anne Marie McGoldrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomko v. Circle Logistics, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02543
Defendant:
Jason Kreger and Circle Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Tomko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
