Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carter v. Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors
as 5:2014cv02009
Plaintiff:
William Carter
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, Laurie Smith, Cheryl Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, et al v. Debra Bowen, et al
as 11-17884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA, Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA PAC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA BOWEN, ROSS JOHNSON, CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE and others
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, et al v. Debra Bowen, et al
as 11-17884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA, Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA PAC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA BOWEN, ROSS JOHNSON, CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae:
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER
Buckholtz v. Santa Clara County et al
as 5:2009cv06037
Plaintiff:
Meagan Buckholtz
Defendant:
Santa Clara County, James T. Beall, Donald F. Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Buckholtz v. Santa Clara County et al
as 3:2009cv06037
Plaintiff:
Meagan Buckholtz
Defendant:
Santa Clara County , James T. Beall, Donald F. Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv04630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv04630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Gabor, et al v. County of Santa Clara Board of, et al
as 08-16239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN GABOR and KAY GABOR
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, in their official capacity, KEN YEAGER, in his municipal and individual capacity, ANN MILLER RAVEL, county counsel, in her municipal and individual capacity and others
Video Software Deal, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 07-16620
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VIDEO SOFTWARE DEALERS ASSOCIATION and ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor, State of California and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of California
Defendant:
GEORGE KENNEDY, in his official capacity as Santa Clara County District Attorney, RICHARD DOYLE, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City of San Jose and ANN MILLER RAVEL, in her official capacity as County Counsel for the County of Santa Clara
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN BOOKSELLERS FOUNDATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION,, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PUBLISHERS, INC., COMIC BOOK LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Video Software Dealers Association et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 5:2005cv04188
Plaintiff:
Video Software Dealers Association, Video Software Dealers Association, Video Software Dealers Association and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bill Lockyer and others
Amicu:
Common Sense Media and Common Sense Media
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
