Cases 11 - 20 of 59
ROMAN v. DIVERSE STAFFING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01187
Defendant:
ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC., DIVERSE STAFFING, INC., ANTHEM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA ROMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BOWERS v. ANTHEM, INC.
as 1:2019cv00802
Plaintiff:
MR LEE BOWERS and LEE BOWERS
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09819
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc. and CIGNA Corporation
Respondent:
Trustmark Services Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
WENC v. ANTHEM INC. et al
as 4:2016cv00176
Defendant:
ANTHEM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
KATE ELAINE WENC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
KRIEGER v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMA et al
as 2:2016cv00020
Defendant:
ANTHEM INC., BCBSM INC., BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF RHODE ISLAND and others
Plaintiff:
MARK KRIEGER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BELL et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv02062
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC., LENOX D. BAKER, JR., SUSAN B. BAYH and others
Plaintiff:
MARY BELL, JANICE GRIDER and CINDY PROKISH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hoffman et al v. Anthem Inc
as 3:2015cv00939
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hoffman and Joseph Hoffman
Defendant:
Anthem Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
YARBER v. ANTHEM, INC.
as 1:2015cv00947
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANDY YARBER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
