Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Anthony Bailey v. USDC-NVL
as 20-71555
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ANTHONY BAILEY and WHITNEY WELCH
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BAILEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Bailey v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv01725
Petitioner:
Anthony Bailey
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Bean et al
as 2:2019cv01021
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
C/O Rohan and AW Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Tyrell et al
as 2:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Justice Michael A. Cherry, Charles Thompson, Tao and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. NDOC et al
as 2:2019cv00057
Defendant:
Warden D. Nevens, D. Tristan, D. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv02515
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
Steven D Grierson, Thomas Groves, Judge Adair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharol Anthony Bailey et al v. The Federal Com. Comm. et al
as 2:2015cv10003
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Bailey and Sharol Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
The Federal Com. Comm. and The United States Tresauary Department
Sharol Anthony Bailey et al v. The US Congress et al
as 2:2015cv09894
Plaintiff:
Norman W Bailey, Sharol Anthony Bailey, Christine C Beynon and others
Defendant:
Silicon Valley, The Dept. of Education, The US Congress and others
Bailey et al v. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2015cv00568
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Bean, Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey and Dean John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. City Attorney's Office of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
City Attorney Jeffrey Barr, City Attorney's Office of North Las Vegas and Nicholas G. Vaskov
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
