Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Bailey et al v. Suey et al
as 2:2012cv01954
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey, Norman Belcher, John Scott and others
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Clark County, Nevada, Lt. Flippo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Bailey v. Samuel Enriquez, et al
as 11-16165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUEL ENRIQUEZ, Officer and KENNETH WINFIELD, Officer
Anthony Bailey v. City of North Las Vegas Police, et al
as 11-15498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAMUEL ENRIQUEZ, Officer, KENNETH WINFIELD, Officer and others
Anthony Bailey v. Clark County D.A. Office, et al
as 10-17672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK COUNTY D.A. OFFICE, DAVID ROGER and CLARK COUNTY DEPUTY D.A.
Bailey v. City of North Las Vegas Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv01398
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
City of North Las Vegas Police Department, Officer Samuel Enriquez, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Bailey v. Douglas Gillespie, et al
as 10-16453
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY BAILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS GILLESPIE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Bailey v. Clark County D.A. Office et al
as 2:2010cv01012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
Clark County D.A. Office, Clark County Deputy D.A. and David Roger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Bailey v. State of California et al
as 5:2010cv00927
Petitioner:
Anthony Bailey
Respondent:
Board of Parole Hearings, Department of Corrections and State of California
Bailey v. State of California et al
as 2:2010cv01187
Petitioner:
Anthony Bailey
Respondent:
State of California, Department of Corrections and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
