Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Todd Ashker, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 23-15154
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER, DANNY TROXELL, GEORGE RUIZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, MATTHEW CATE, ANTHONY CHAUS, Chief, Office of Correctional Safety, CDCR and others
Todd Ashker, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 22-15345
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER, DANNY TROXELL, GEORGE RUIZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, MATTHEW CATE, ANTHONY CHAUS, Chief, Office of Correctional Safety, CDCR and others
King Mwasi v. Ralph Diaz
as 2:2021cv06467
Plaintiff:
King Mwasi
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, D. Romero, D.J. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Ashker, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 18-16427
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER, DANNY TROXELL, GEORGE RUIZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Govenor of the State of California, MATTHEW CATE, ANTHONY CHAUS, Chief, Office of Correctional Safety, CDCR and others
Jeffrey Franklin v. George Giurbino, et al
as 17-15407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY ANTHONY FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE GIURBINO, SUZAN HUBBARD, Warden, D. ROTHSCHILD and others
Franklin v. Brown et al
as 4:2015cv04755
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Anthony Franklin
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Matthew Cate, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez, Jr. v. Brown, Jr. et al
as 3:2013cv00556
Plaintiff:
Juan Angel Martinez, Jr. and Luis Quezada
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Matthew Cate, Anthony Chaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez et al v. Brown et al
as 3:2012cv04827
Plaintiff:
Juan Angel Martinez, Jr. and Luis Quezada
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Matthew Cate, Anthony Chaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
