Cases 11 - 20 of 24
CHRISTIAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69490
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANTHONY CHRISTIAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Booker (Britt)
as 18-2170
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jamie Booker, AKA Mo-Mo, Anthony Christian, AKA Nitty, Harvey Christian, AKA Black and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony Britt, AKA N-O
United States of America v. Booker (Ford)
as 18-1776
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jamie Booker, AKA Mo-Mo, Anthony Britt, AKA N-O, Anthony Christian, AKA Nitty and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Paul Ford, AKA Uncles, AKA Unks, AKA Dred, AKA Ninja
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christian v. Rotech Holdings, LTD., et al
as 1:2017mc00024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Christian
Defendant:
Rotech Holdings, LTD., et al
United States of America v. Booker (Quinn)
as 17-437
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jamie Booker, AKA Mo-Mo, Anthony Britt, AKA N-O, Harvey Christian, AKA Black and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jason Quinn, AKA Q
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Booker (Anthony Christian)
as 16-2970
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jamie Booker, AKA Mo-Mo, Anthony Britt, AKA N-O, Harvey Christian, AKA Black and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony Christian, AKA Nitty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv62485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
