Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cole v. Davis et al
as 4:2021cv03050
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr.
Defendant:
L Davis, Bobby Lumpkin and Correctional Officer Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. U.S Department of Justice et al.
as 1:2018cv00482
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Cole
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, ADX Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cole, Sr. v. Taco Bell, Co et al
as 1:2016cv00815
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr.
Defendant:
Taco Bell, Co, Frito Lays, Co., Inc. and Yum Yum Brands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Federal Transfer Center - Oklahoma City
as 3:2015cv03164
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center - Oklahoma City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. United States Penitentiary - Florence
as 3:2015cv03165
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary - Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Volunteers of America- Halfway House
as 3:2015cv03163
Petitioner:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr
Defendant:
Volunteers of America- Halfway House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Cole, Sr. v. Frito Lays Company, et al
as 15-10914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY ANTHONY COLE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FRITO LAYS COMPANY, TACO BELL COMPANY, PEPSI COMPANY and others
Cole v. Frito Lays Co et al
as 3:2015cv01875
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr
Defendant:
Frito Lays Co, Taco Bell Co, Pepsi Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Frito Lays et al
as 3:2013cv01819
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr
Defendant:
Taco Bell, Frito Lays, Pepsi Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Shelby Co. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cole
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corrections, Correct Care Solutions, Randolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
