Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Amaker v. Gerbing et al
as 9:2019cv01253
Defendant:
C.O. Barber, P. Wolff, S. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Amaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaker v. Schiraldi
as 17-3675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant - Appellee:
Vincent N. Schiraldi, New York City Department of Probation, Anna Bermudez, New York City Department of Probation, Greg Kuziw, New York City Department of Probation and others
Amaker v. Annucci
as 17-1807
Plaintiff:
Batise D. Amaker and Grace D. Amaker
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jeffrey McCoy, William A. Lee and others
Amaker v. Gerbing et al
as 1:2017cv03520
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant:
K. Gerbing, P. Early, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amaker v. Fischer
as 16-2829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark L. Bradt, Supt., Brian S. Fischer, Comm., William Hughes, Dep. Supt. and others
Amaker v. Schiraldi et al
as 1:2015cv04879
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant:
K. Armstrong, P. Bell, A. Bermudez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaker et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2014cv09692
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Amaker, Batise D. Amaker and Grace D. Amaker
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jeffrey McCoy, William A. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amaker v. Senkowski
as 9:1999cv01255
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Amaker
Respondent:
Daniel A. Senkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amaker v. Lee et al
as 1:2013cv05292
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant:
William Lee, Anthoney J. Annucci, Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amaker v. Lee et al
as 7:2013cv05292
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant:
William Lee, Anthoney J. Annucci, Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.