Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Anthony Cherry v. Mitchem G., et al
as 15-10341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHEM G., #1911, Sheriff's Deputy and OSCEOLA COUNTY
Cherry v. Sheriff, Osceola County et al
as 6:2014cv01621
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Cherry
Defendant:
Sheriff, Osceola County, Mitchem G. and Darlene Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Cherry v. Robert Hansell, et al
as 14-13634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. HANSELL, Sheriff, G. MITCHEM, #1911 Sheriff's Deputy and DARLENE ROLLINS, Public Defender
Anthony Cherry v. Mayor, Orange County Florida, et al
as 14-12763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR, ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA and SHERIFF, ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA
Cherry v. Hansell
as 6:2014cv00904
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Cherry
Defendant:
Robert E. Hansell, G Mitchem and Darlene Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Mayor, Orange County Florida et al
as 6:2014cv00861
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Cherry
Defendant:
Mayor, Orange County Florida and Sheriff, Orange County Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Mayor, Orange County Florida et al
as 6:2013cv00832
Defendant:
Anthony D. Cherry, Mayor, Orange County Florida and Sheriff of Orange County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHERRY v HARRIS et al
as 5:2008cv00091
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY D CHERRY
Defendant:
HARRIS and WASHINGTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Harris et al
as 3:2008cv00271
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Cherry
Defendant:
Warden Harris and Washington C.I.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cherry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00190
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Cherry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
