Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Young v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Kiaran Young
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. McGilton et al
as 4:2023cv01950
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Jared McGilton, Jodi Starr, James Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Davis et al.
as 4:2023cv01851
Plaintiff:
Trevon Bates and Readbates
Defendant:
Warden Anthony Davis, Deputy Warden fnu Evans, Lieutenant fnu Smallwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irizarry v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al.
as 4:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Ismael Irizarry
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, O.D.R.C. Director Annette Chambers, Warden Anthony Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Fields v. Davis
as 1:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Kurtis Fields
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bard v. Davis
as 5:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
David Paul Bard
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. McGilton et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Jared McGilton, Jodi Starr, James Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. McGilton et al
as 2:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Jared McGilton, Jodi Starr, James Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Davis
as 4:2022cv01962
Petitioner:
Marcus Alexander Branch
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
