Cases 1 - 10 of 11
James v. Edwards
as 21-1049
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony Edwards
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vanessa James
James v. Edwards
as 1:2021cv01059
Plaintiff:
Vanessa James
Defendant:
Anthony Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Bronx Miracle Gospel Ta
as 20-3313
Petitioner / Appellant:
Elder Cynthia Williams, Elouise Bacchus, Sharon Redley and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Deborah A. Piazza, Chapter 7 Trustee, in her official capacity and Hon. Stuart M. Bernstein, Bankruptcy Court Judge, in his official capacity
Petitioner:
Newell Funding LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07416
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Friedland v. The Act 1 Group
as 18-1879
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jered Friedland
Defendant:
The Act 1 Group, Advanced American Style Inc., DBA b michael America and Brett Howroyd, individually
Defendant - Appellant:
Mark-Anthony Edwards, individually and Michael Anthony Brown, individually
Edwards v. Semple
as 18-672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M.A. Edwards and Michael Anthony Edwards
Defendant - Appellee:
Semple, Individual and Official Capacity, Micah, Director Pop.Man., Individual and Official Capacity, Mulligan, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Friedland v. The Act 1 Group et al
as 1:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
Jered Friedland
Defendant:
The Act 1 Group, Advanced American Style Inc., Brett Howroyd and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Barnett v. Advanced American Style, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10165
Plaintiff:
James Barnett
Defendant:
Advanced American Style, Inc., Michael Anthony Brown and Mark-Anthony Edwards
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Edwards v. Chiapetta
as 6:2014cv06182
Petitioner:
Anthony Edwards
Respondent:
M. Chiappetta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Chiapetta
as 1:2014cv01239
Respondent:
Mr. Chiapetta
Petitioner:
Anthony Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
