Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS Rogers v. United States
as 1:2022cv00008
Defendant: United States of America, Anthony Rogers and United States
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS Rogers v. United States
as 1:2021cv00433
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant: United States of America and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rogers v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv00425
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant: United States , Tina Nommay, Thomas O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv00018
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant: United States , Tina Nommay, Thomas O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rogers v. O'Malley
as 1:2010cv00416
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant: Thomas O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. United States et al
as 1:2010cv00220
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant: United States, Theresa L Springmann, Tina Nommay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. United States et al
as 1:2010cv00139
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant: United States , Theresa L Springmann , Tina Nommay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. USA
as 1:2009cv00236
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Anthony Lee Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rogers v. United States et al
as 1:2008cv00183
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant: United States, United States, Tina Nommay and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Rogers v. United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00162
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant: United States, Tina Nommay and Theresa L Springmann
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?