Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lockhart v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lockhart, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Corrections Complex Yazoo City and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lockhart, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Corrections Complex Yazoo City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation
as 1:2022cv05875
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lockhart
Defendant:
Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation doing business as Advocate Auroa Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Lockhart v. Seibel
as 5:2018cv06774
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Lockhart
Respondent:
Kimberly Seibel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lockhart v. Seibel
as 5:2017cv07110
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Lockhart
Respondent:
Kimberly Seibel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lockhart v. Sherrer
as 3:2017cv03668
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Lockhart
Defendant:
Gary L. Sherrer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2016cv03768
Plaintiff:
Dawn Buckley , Lionel Hamilton , Holly Perkins and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lockhart v. United States Of America
as 1:2015cv22790
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lockhart, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lockhart v. United States Of America
as 0:2015cv61663
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lockhart, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
