Cases 1 - 10 of 44
CRAWFORD v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2023cv23002
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR, DEPUTY WARDEN REBECCA FRANCESCHINI, SGT. LISA ROJAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIKE v. RASPANTINI et al
as 3:2023cv22610
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE PIKE
Defendant:
ANTHONY M. RASPANTINI, JOHN DOES 1-5, ABC COS. 3-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
GABRIS v. GABRIS et al
as 1:2023cv02507
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. GABRIS
Defendant:
ANTHONY M. GABRIS, CHRIS GABRIS, MICHELLE GABRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODRIGUEZ v. SCHEERER et al
as 3:2022cv05789
Plaintiff:
WILLY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
ANTHONY M. SCHEERER, COMMUNITY DURABLE, JOHN AND JANE DOE (1-100) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
YOHANANOV v. DEVINE et al
as 2:2022cv05186
Plaintiff:
ASA YOHANANOV
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES G. DEVINE, JUDGE ANDREW W. WUBBENHORST, ANTHONY M. ARBORE, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUGGINS et al v. SANDILOS et al
as 1:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUGGINS, BRUCE HOUGH, LUIS VAZQUEZ and others
Defendant:
DEPUTY P.D. CHARLES P. SANDILOS, ASST. DEPUTY P.D. KIMBERLY SCHULTZ, OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS CUMBERLAND COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACRISON, INC. v. RAINONE et al
as 2:2022cv01176
Plaintiff:
ACRISON, INC.
Defendant:
ANTHONY M. RAINONE, BRACH EICHLER LLC, XCELLENCE, INC. d/b/a XACT DATA DISCOVERY and others
PAGANO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2021cv17714
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M PAGANO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MINGUELA v. ROMANTINO et al
as 1:2020cv01893
Defendant:
J. SCOTT THOMSON, ODISE CARR, LIEUNTENANT JOSEPH WYSOCKI and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MINGUELA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
