Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Womack v. Foster, et al
as 14-1295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE WOMACK
Defendant - Appellee:
DARREN FOSTER, Correctional Counselor, ADX Florence, ELEANOR ALEXANDER, Discipline Hearing Officer, North Central Regional Office, RICHARD ARKO, Senior Officer Specialist, ADX Florence and others
Buhl v. Rangel et al
as 1:2014cv02086
Plaintiff:
Leroy Buhl
Defendant:
Patricia Rangel, D. Berkebile, Bob Custard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Andreis et al
as 1:2014cv00645
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
M. Andreis , Anthony Osagie and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Noy v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
James Van Noy
Defendant:
David Berkebile, G. Hall, Anthony Osagie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Al-Amin v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2013cv02844
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin
Defendant:
David Berkebile, Shon Kuta, Patricia Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv02681
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Anthony Osagie, David Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Custard v. Allred et al
as 1:2013cv02296
Plaintiff:
Bob Allen Custard
Defendant:
David Allred, Chavez, Clemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2013cv01866
Plaintiff:
David Lee Womack
Defendant:
David Berkebile, Patricia Rangel, Darren Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Osagie et al
as 1:2013cv01607
Plaintiff:
La'Ron Marshall
Defendant:
Anthony Osagie, R. Camacho, C. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coplen v. Osagie et al
as 1:2013cv01429
Plaintiff:
Scott Alex Coplen
Defendant:
Anthony Osagie, David Allred, C. Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
