Cases 1 - 10 of 44
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CORDING v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY P. CORDING
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KIRCHHOEFER et al v. Trozzolillo
as 2:2020cv03577
Plaintiff:
SEAN M. FULMER and MICHAEL KIRCHHOEFER
Defendant:
Anthony P Trozzolillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catanzaro v. Harned et al
as 3:2019cv00806
Defendant:
Barbara Harned and Maurice Lamoreux
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Catanzaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANGJELI v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL I et al
as 2:2018cv02882
Defendant:
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL I and ANTHONY P. SODROSKI
Plaintiff:
SUZANA VANGJELI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Catanzaro v. Harned et al
as 3:2017cv01487
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Catanzaro
Defendant:
Barbara Harned, Paul Hindmarch and Maurice Lamoreux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUBIN v. INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv02066
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUBIN
Defendant:
INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ANTHONY P. ZOOK, JONATHAN SYMONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
HUANG v. INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv00740
Plaintiff:
JIANMIN HUANG
Defendant:
INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ANTHONY P. ZOOK, JOSE CARMONA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
