Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RHODES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19962
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RHODES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BECK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16363
Plaintiff:
ANJALETTA BECK, ARNALDO SANTIAGO, ROBERT JEROME TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harmon v. Fayette County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Alfonso Harmon
Defendant:
Fayette County Sheriff Office, Fayette County Jail, Deputy Chief Anthony Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RHODES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54328
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RHODES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91619
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ANTHONY RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 3:2018cv00098
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL B MORRIS
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Major Anthony Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Munden v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Adolphus Munden
Defendant:
Anthony Rhodes, Captain Henkel and Fayette County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munden v. Musgrave et al
as 3:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Adolphus Munden
Defendant:
Joshua Musgrave, Bell, Anthony Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weiters et al v. Fayette County et al
as 3:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Dwight Weiters
Defendant:
Fayette County, Robert M. Crawford, Unknown Magistrate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
Detrick D. Whitehead
Defendant:
Anthony Rhodes and Fayette County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
