Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Anthony Scocozzo v. Sheriff, Baker County, et al
as 26-11893
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOCOZZO
Defendant:
SHERIFF, BAKER COUNTY, DEPUTY THOMAS DYAL, JR., SERGEANT TYLER BALDWYN and others
Scocozzo v. Dyal et al
as 3:2026cv00592
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOCOZZO
Defendant:
THOMAS DYAL, JR., TYLER BALDWYN, BRAD DOUGHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scocozzo v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2026cv00572
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scocozzo
Defendant:
Sheriff Scotty Rhoden, Lieutenant Charles Peacock, Sgt. Wyatt Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scocozzo v. Rhoden, Sheriff of Baker County et al
as 3:2026cv00488
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scocozzo
Defendant:
Sherrif Scott Rhoden, Coordinator Justina Dyal, Nurses Jane Doe 1 - 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scocozzo v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2026cv00267
Defendant:
Detective Rebecca Parker, Sheriff Scott Rhoden, Deputy Thomas Dyal, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scocozzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Scocozzo v. Sheriff, Baker County
as 25-11567
Petitioner:
ANTHONY SCOCOZZO
Respondent:
SHERIFF, BAKER COUNTY
Anthony Scocozzo v. Sheriff, Baker County Florida, et al
as 25-11496
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOCOZZO
Defendant:
SHERIFF, SHERIFF, BAKER COUNTY, THOMAS DYAL, JR. and others
Scocozzo v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2025cv00373
Defendant:
Detective Rebecca Parker, Sheriff Scott Rhoden, Deputy Thomas Dyal, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scocozzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Scocozzo v. Attorney General, State of Florida
as 25-10951
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOCOZZO
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Scocozzo v. Adams et al
as 3:2025cv00168
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scocozzo
Defendant:
Samuel Dylan Adams, Sheriff Scotty Rhoden, Unknown Homewav Administrator (Jarms) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
