Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Officer Baker and Lance Korando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Lieutenant Blake, Lieutenant Chiggy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcellus French, Sr. v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. FRENCH, SR.
Defendant:
ANTHONY WILLS, MAJOR ROWLAND, JOSHUA A. SCHOENBECK and others
Harper v. Hart et al
as 3:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Eazs A. Harper
Defendant:
C/O Hart, C/O Bent, Nurse Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Unknown Parties
as 3:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Steven Murphy
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Anthony Wills, Wexford Health Source and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Merriman et al
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Robinson
Defendant:
Jerard Merriman, Amanda Smith, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Wills
as 3:2024cv00467
Petitioner:
Edward S. Phillips
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Hills and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nellem v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Dartrell Nellem
Defendant:
Menard Correctional Center, Anthony Wills and C/O Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 1:2024cv02794
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Respondent:
Anthony Wills and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarence Britten v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 24-1547
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE BRITTEN
Defendant:
ANTHONY WILLS, Warden, CARRI MORRIS, Leading Social Worker, Menard CC and SHERRI BUETTNER, MHP, Menard CC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
