Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Guillermo Antonio Vasquez-Landaver v. Santa Ana Police Department
as 2:2010cv06530
Defendant:
Santa Ana Police Department
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Antonio Vasquez-Landaver
Guillermo Antontion Vasquez Landaver v. Santa Ana Police Department
as 8:2010cv01005
Defendant:
Santa Ana Police Department
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Antonio Vasquez Landaver
Vasquez v. Jacquez et al
as 5:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vasquez
Defendant:
Francisco Jacquez, Matthew Cate, M. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez-Landaver v. USA
as 3:2009cv00729
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Guillermo Antonio Vasquez-Landaver
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Arture Alvarado et al v. Hanson Roof Tile Inc et al
as 5:2008cv01459
Plaintiff:
Arture Alvarado, Jose Avalos, Efren Barriga and others
Defendant:
Hanson Roof Tile Inc, Hanson Roof Tile Inc and Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Antonio Vasquez-Montanez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-74113
Petitioner:
ANTONIO VASQUEZ-MONTANEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Medina et al v. City of Menlo Park et al
as 4:2008cv03946
Plaintiff:
Maria Medina, Maria Medina, Maria Medina and others
Defendant:
City of Menlo Park, Jonathan Baxter, Nicholas Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medina et al v. City of Menlo Park et al
as 5:2008cv03946
Plaintiff:
Maria Medina, Maria Medina, Maria Medina and others
Defendant:
City of Menlo Park, Jonathan Baxter, Nicholas Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Antonio Soto-Vasquez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-72354
Petitioner:
ANTONIO SOTO-VASQUEZ, Antonio Vasquez Soto
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Vasquez-Landaver
as 07-50226
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GUILLERMO ANTONIO VASQUEZ-LANDAVER, aka Gabriel Gonzalo Campos-Landaver
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
