Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
APAC SOUTHEAST INC v. BURNHAM PAVING, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2010cv00345
Plaintiff:
APAC SOUTHEAST INC
Defendant:
BURNHAM PAVING, L.L.C., BURNHAM PAVING & STRIPING, LLC, JASON C BURNHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Apac-Southeast, Inc. v. Malphrus Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Apac-Southeast, Inc.
Defendant:
Malphrus Construction Co., Inc., BE&K Building Group, LLC., Federal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. APAC-Southeast, Inc.
as 1:2010cv20632
Plaintiff:
Soraya Martinez
Defendant:
APAC-SOUTHEAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BAKER v. APAC SOUTHEAST INC
as 3:2009cv00423
Plaintiff:
NORMAN L BAKER
Defendant:
APAC SOUTHEAST INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. APAC-Southeast, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01516
Defendant:
APAC-Southeast, Inc. and APAC-Georgia, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Petitioner:
The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Not Classified By Court:
AIG Domestic Claims, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Birmingham Airport Authority et al
as 2:2007cv00591
Plaintiff:
Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
Birmingham Airport Authority, Birmingham Airport Authority, Birmingham Airport Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Sewell et al v. Barge, Waggoner, Sumner, and Cannon, INc.,
as 5:2007cv00447
Plaintiff:
Stacey Sewell and Annie Sewell
Defendant:
Barge, Waggoner, Sumner, and Cannon, Inc.,, Barge, Waggoner, Sumner, and Cannon, Inc.,, APAC-Southeast, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
