Cases 81 - 90 of 133
LEDEZMA DIAZ v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2016mc21811
Petitioner:
ANTONIO LEDEZMA DIAZ
Respondent:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parkervision, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01477
Defendant:
LG Electronics MobileCOMM U.S.A., Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Apple Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Parkervision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Chery et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02985
Plaintiff:
Omar Chery and Quentin Sanders
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Sean McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv22663
Plaintiff:
Douglas T. Edwards and Mobile World View Technologies, Innovations, Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc. , Harshaw Research, Inc., Dale J Ream and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Britto Central, Inc. v. Redman et al
as 1:2015cv21320
Plaintiff:
Britto Central, Inc.
Defendant:
Craig Redman, Karl Maier, Karl Maier, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Blacksberg v. Apple Inc.
as 0:2015cv60332
Plaintiff:
Richard Blacksberg
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Mediator:
Markel Arrizabalaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph Guthrie, III v. U.S. Government, et al
as 14-14047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDOLPH H. GUTHRIE, III
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, CITY OF NEW YORK, CITY OF MIAMI and others
ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL INNOVATIONS, LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2014cv22658
Plaintiff:
ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
