Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 898
TOT Power Control, S.L. v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff: TOT Power Control, S.L.
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0007 Petition to compel attendance before arbitrator
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01348
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Chiuchiarelli et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 5:2024cv01895
Plaintiff: Jennifer B. Chiuchiarelli, April H. Yamaichi, Kiyomi Ishii and others
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Dwyer et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01844
Plaintiff: Richard Dwyer and Aimen Halim
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Schermer v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2024cv01815
Plaintiff: Jared Schermer
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Collins et al v. Apple Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01796
Plaintiff: Deborah Collins, Hunter Collins and Henry Morales
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
In re Ex Parte Application of: Qualcomm Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024mc80019
Plaintiff: In re Ex Parte Application of: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Respondent: Apple Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Bakay et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff: Luisa Bakay, Elisa Jones and Leticia Shaw
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Keyvan Samini v. Apple Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00249
Plaintiff: Keyvan Samini
Defendant: Apple Inc. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Matthews v. Apple, Inc. California Corporation
as 4:2024cv00272
Plaintiff: Michael Matthews
Defendant: APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?