Cases 71 - 80 of 164
Apple, Inc. v. DOE
as 1:2017mc00150
Petitioner:
Apple, Inc.
Respondent:
DOE
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Brown v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00369
Defendant:
Apple Inc., CRM Search Inc., Corporate Con Edison and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Seife v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09915
Plaintiff:
Charles Seife
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. , Audible, Inc. and Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Andrea Electronics Corporation v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2016cv05220
Plaintiff:
Andrea Electronics Corporation
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Vigorito v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03082
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Benito Vigorito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ochei v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01515
Plaintiff:
Joan I Ochei
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Apple Store Upper West Side and Barclay Card
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fedorova v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2016cv01058
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizaveta Fedorova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ponderosa Twins Plus One et al v. iHeartMedia Inc et al
as 1:2016cv00953
Plaintiff:
Ponderosa Twins Plus One and Ricky Spicer
Defendant:
iHeartMedia Inc, Spotify USA Inc., Google Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lerman v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2015cv07381
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christina Gonzalez, Chaim Lerman, James Vorrasi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Order requiring Apple, Inc. to assist in the execution of a search warrant issued by the court et al
as 1:2015mc01902
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union
Interested Party:
Apple Inc.
In Re:
Order requiring Apple, Inc. to assist in the execution of a search warrant issued by the court
Movant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
