Cases 171 - 180 of 180
Medway v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jacob Medway and Jacob Medway
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keller v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Peter Keller and Peter Keller
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ashikian et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv05810
Plaintiff:
Haig P Ashikian and Haig P Ashikian
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Apple Computer Peripherals, Inc and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Keller v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv02134
Plaintiff:
Peter Keller
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DEVINE v. MIHOK et al
as 3:2008cv05442
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DEVINE
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN A. MIHOK, FLIGHT-DYNAMIX, LLC., VIPER PITS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Koschitzki v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv04451
Plaintiff:
Avi Koschitzki
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gomelsky v. Apple, Inc.
as 5:2008cv04969
Plaintiff:
Giorgio Gomelsky and Giorgio Gomelsky
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smith, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2008cv01498
Plaintiff:
Jessica Alena Smith, Jessica Alena Smith, Jessica Alena Smith and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Apple, Inc. and Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Joseph Birdsong, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 08-16641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BIRDSONG, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated and BRUCE WAGGONER, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
F.B. T. Productions, LLC et al v. Aftermath Records et al
as 2:2007cv03314
Defendant:
Aftermath Records, Interscope Records, UMG Recording, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Em2M, LLC and F.B. T. Productions, LLC
Interested Party:
Rick James and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
