Cases 91 - 100 of 242
Lee v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2018cv07235
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lee
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Idea Factory Labs Limited v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2018cv09145
Plaintiff:
Idea Factory Labs Limited
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Subpoenas to Intel Corp., in Connection with: Qualcomm Incorporated
as 5:2018mc80124
Defendant:
Subpoenas to Intel Corp., in Connection with: Qualcomm Incorporated and Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Respondent:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Binatena v. Apple Inc
as 5:2018cv03299
Plaintiff:
Diego Binatena
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
In re Ex Parte Application of Apple Inc.; Apple Distribution International; and Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG
as 3:2018cv01055
Petitioner:
Apple Inc. , Apple Distribution International and Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG
Respondent:
Qualcomm Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al
as 3:2018cv00803
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Compal Electronics Inc., Hon Hai Percision Industry Co., Ltd., FIH Mobile LTD. and others
Defendant:
Non-Party MDL Plaintiffs and Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc
Respondent:
Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC and Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy Corporation
In Re:
Qualcomm Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steve Walker v. Apple Inc et al
as 5:2018cv00846
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Steve Walker
Mohammed v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2018cv02438
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neilan v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2018cv02319
Plaintiff:
Sean Neilan
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Julius J. Harang et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02998
Defendant:
Apple Inc, Tim Cook, John Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Glaze, Stephen Goerke, Julius J. Harang and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
