Cases 11 - 20 of 164
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Garage Employees Local 272 Labor Management Pension Fund v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Garage Employees Local 272 Labor Management Pension Fund
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Tim Cook, Art Levinson and others
Perdigon v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv01828
Plaintiff:
Andrew Perdigon
Defendant:
United States, Merrick Garland, Leticia James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
Katie Alvarez
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Robinson v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
Barry Robinson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Herrara v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Juan Herrara
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Farley v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Farley
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Morales v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2022cv10872
Plaintiff:
Alex Morales
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Scales v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2022cv07859
Plaintiff:
William Scales
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scales v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2022cv09683
Plaintiff:
William Scales
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cheikhaoui v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv08855
Plaintiff:
Kamal Cheikhaoui
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Apple, Inc., Omniscient Investigations Corp. d/b/a OIC Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
