Cases 81 - 90 of 106
Liewald v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07566
Plaintiff:
Sabine Liewald
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Computers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Blagman v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05453
Plaintiff:
Norman Blagman
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Amazon.Com, Inc., Google Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Luce et al v. Gomez et al
as 3:2012cv02063
Plaintiff:
Tom Luce , Brian Kroll , Matt Blackett and others
Defendant:
Selena Gomez, Selena Gomez & The Scene, Lindy Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation
as 10-15113
Plaintiff - Appellee:
APPLE INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
PSYSTAR CORPORATION
Korpi v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2011cv00906
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shanti Deva Korpi
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Alexander v. Murdoch
as 11-4291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Alexander
Defendant:
News Corporation, Inc., a corporation and ABC, Inc., and Affiliates, wholly owned Subsidiary of The Walt Disney Co., Inc., a corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Keith Rupert Murdoch, Officer, owner New Corportion, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., wholly owned subsidiary of News Corp, Inc. a corporation and others
Thale v. Apple, Inc
as 3:2011cv03778
Plaintiff:
Taea Thale
Defendant:
Apple, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Thale v. Apple, Inc
as 5:2011cv03778
Plaintiff:
Taea Thale
Defendant:
Apple, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Apple Inc. et al v. Dollisme
as 3:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc. , Adobe Systems Incorporated , Autodesk, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Edy Jean Dollisme
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
eForCity Corporation et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2011cv00808
Plaintiff:
Accstation Inc., Everydaysource Inc., Itrimming Inc. and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
