Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Apple v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv04030
Plaintiff:
Karen Apple
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Apple et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07243
Plaintiff:
Patricia Apple and Roger A. Barnett, II
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. $167,147.27 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$167,147.27 in United States Currency, One German Sports Guns GSG-5 firearm, .22 caliber, Serial No. A340816, One Glock Model 23 firearm, .40 caliber, Serial No. SFU885 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Apple v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11974
Plaintiff:
Emily L. Apple
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Appling v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07972
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Appling
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Apple v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07623
Plaintiff:
Sue Apple
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Appling v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19000
Plaintiff:
Sharon Elaine Appling
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Appling et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv10571
Plaintiff:
Glenda Appling and Mark Appling
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larew v. Apple American Group
as 1:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Kerensa Larew
Defendant:
Apple American Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SMB CONSULTING AND INVESTING LLC v. APPLE VALLEY WASTE SERVICE, INC.
as 3:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
SMB CONSULTING AND INVESTING LLC
Defendant:
APPLE VALLEY WASTE SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
