Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WELLS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
APRIL WELLS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WELLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17986
Plaintiff:
APRIL WELLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv13018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv11032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
WELLS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv09755
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
APRIL WELLS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Springer et al v. Zions Bancorporation
as 2:2019cv00035
Plaintiff:
Lexi Rolfe, Brian Mallroy, Denise Murdock and others
Defendant:
Zions Bancorporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Gregory et al v. Zions Bancorporation
as 2:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Wayne Baker, Mike Israel, Stephen Beverley and others
Defendant:
Zions Bancorporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Corey Thurman, Edward Terry, JDH Family LTD Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
April Wells et al v. Deutsche National Bank et al
as 2:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
April Wells and Diandrea Bryant
Defendant:
Deutsche National Bank and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
