Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Ins
as 24-40323
Plaintiff:
Aramark Services, Incorporated Group Health Plan, Aramark Services Incorporated, formerly known as Aramark Corporation, Aramark Uniform Services, Group Health and Welfare Plan and others
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Muhammad v. Wiles
as 23-50786
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bilal Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard Wiles, El Paso County Sheriff, Marco Vargas, Kevin Lanahan and others
English v. Aramark
as 21-20554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant / Appellee:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, L.L.C.
Anthony Booker v. Aramark Services, Incorporated, et al
as 20-11033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Dewayne Booker
Defendant / Appellee:
Aramark Services, Incorporated, Jane Doe, Morning Kitchen Supervisor Wichita County Jail and Mr. Gross
Owen Crawford, Sr. v. Aramark, et al
as 20-20170
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK, Harris County Seriff's Office Jail and HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE JAIL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OWEN KEITH CRAWFORD, SR.
Bilal Muhammad v. Richard Wiles, et al
as 20-50279
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID STOUT, RICARDO SAMANIEGO, EL PASO COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILAL MUHAMMAD
Lastersteen Thompson v. Ed Gonzales, et al
as 20-20089
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK, SERGEANT VILLABOBOZ, SHERIFF ED GONZALES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LASTERSTEEN THOMPSON
Jake English v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 19-20412
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, L.L.C. and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAKE ANTHONY ENGLISH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marlon Smith v. Bexar County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 15-50413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, RAUL BANASCO, Jail Administrator and ARAMARK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
