Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Tipton et al v. Aramark Services Inc
as 3:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Ida Michelle Tipton and Heith Cornell Mayes
Defendant:
Aramark Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Robles v. L3Harris Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Rafael Robles
Defendant:
L3Harris Technologies, Inc., L3 Technologies, Inc., Aramark Services, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wright v. Putman et al
as 3:2021cv02074
Plaintiff:
Sue Wright
Defendant:
Katherine Putman, Aramark Food Service of Texas, LLC and Aramark Food and Support Services
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Breaux v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
as 3:2021cv01718
Plaintiff:
Yndia Breaux
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Osborne v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Reggie Osborne
Defendant:
Aramark Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beckett v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC
as 4:2019cv01018
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marquis Beckett
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cowen v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
as 3:2018cv02166
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
Plaintiff:
Cody Cowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Booker v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 7:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Booker
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Gross and Cynthia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
