Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00011
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GRUNDY v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00400
Defendant: ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff: SCOTT GRUNDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00613
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01458
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOYD v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2011cv00738
Defendant: ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICE, CHAPLAIN SCHAEFER, CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff: SHAVON TYVELL BOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00367
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
TRUAX v. CORELL et al
as 2:2010cv00303
Defendant: ARAMARK INC., CHARLES BRANN and CURT CORELL
Plaintiff: JAMES B. TRUAX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DOUGLAS et al v. ARAMARK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00912
Plaintiff: CARRIE DOUGLAS and JOSHUA JAMES DAVIES
Defendant: ARAMARK, ARAMARK, SHAWN MCKEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00424
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?