Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01350
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lundquist v. Effingham County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00214
Plaintiff: Kenneth Lundquist
Defendant: Effingham County, City of Rincon, GA, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00144
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01184
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00076
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03393
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniels v. Kimbrough et al
as 1:2012cv00469
Plaintiff: Douglas Daniels
Defendant: Kim Kimbrough, Aramark Food Service and Clayton County Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemmons v. Clayton County Jail et al
as 1:2011cv02802
Plaintiff: Jermaine K. Clemmons
Defendant: Clayton County Jail and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nasa v. Aramark Food Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02746
Plaintiff: Susa Nasa
Defendant: Aramark Food Services , Trinity Food Group, Inc. and Correctional Medical Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neville v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv02688
Plaintiff: Turnbull Neville, Sr.
Defendant: State of Georgia, Clayton County, Ashley Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?