Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Pruitt v. Roederer Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Arthur Pruitt
Defendant:
Roederer Correctional Complex, Aramark Food Service, Mike Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bryant v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 3:2012cv00430
Plaintiff:
Danny Bryant
Defendant:
Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 3:2012cv00510
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Smith
Defendant:
Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Aramark et al
as 3:2011cv00517
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Johnson
Defendant:
Aramark, Cookie Crews, Jane and John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Jazz Adams, Rodney Grimes, Marcus Carey and others
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Kentucky Department of Corrections, Samuel Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Aramark Correctional Services, et al
as 3:2009cv00160
Plaintiff:
John Robert Edwards, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Steve Haney and Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cox v. Aramark et al
as 3:2008cv00302
Plaintiff:
Claude Cox
Defendant:
Aramark, Ashley, Jerry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
National Tour Association, Inc. v. Aramark Corporation
as 5:2008cv00242
Plaintiff:
National Tour Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Counter Claimant:
Aramark Corporation
Counter Defendant:
National Tour Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv00083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
