Cases 11 - 20 of 52
BERRY et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, BRANDON PHERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brake v. All Westville Law Library D.O.C. Staff et al
as 3:2021cv00740
Plaintiff:
Samuel Vande Brake
Defendant:
All Westville Law Library D.O.C. Staff, Hicks, Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00658
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Strickland and Samuel Lee Strickland, Jr
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VERMILLION v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01278
Defendant:
MARTIAL R. KNIESER, PAUL A. TALBOT, MONICA GIPSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COVINGTON v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE OF INDIANA L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00134
Defendant:
D. BEDWELL, B. SMITH and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE OF INDIANA L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
TODD COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLES v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03204
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC., JANE DOE, H. WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JESTER v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 2:2020cv00461
Defendant:
LISA BOCK, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, DANIEL BEDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALTER v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
as 2:2020cv00449
Plaintiff:
TRACEY LAMOUAR SALTER, II and GODLY DASYPUL
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCMULLEN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2020cv00343
Defendant:
D. BEDWELL, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE OF INDIANA, LLC and B. SMITH
Plaintiff:
HENRY TYWAN MCMULLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 3:2019cv01153
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Taylor
Defendant:
Ellis and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
