Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Cline v. Arceo et al
as 3:2024cv05309
Plaintiff:
Lyric Leeyn Cline, Sr
Defendant:
Montana Arceo and Brandon Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arceo et al v. Hyundai Motor America
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arceo and Maribel Arceo
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
ARCEO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO ARCEO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Sanchez Arceo v. Jhonsen
as 5:2023ct03074
Plaintiff:
Alexez Nicolas Sanchez Arceo
Defendant:
C/O T. Jhonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stark et al v. Frida Drywall Systems L.L.C. et al
as 0:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jeff Stark, Nick Nowak, Clark Anderson and others
Defendant:
Frida Drywall Systems L.L.C., Karla Arceo and Karla S. Arceo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nilsen et al v Frida Drywall Systems L.L.C. et al
as 0:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Pat Nilsen and John Nesse
Defendant:
Frida Drywall Systems L.L.C. and Karla S. Arceo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
(PC) Tamrat v. CA Health Care Facility-Administration et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Herman Tamrat
Defendant:
California Health Care Facility-Administration, Chief Medical Office Doe, D. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCEO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ARCEO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
