Cases 51 - 60 of 235
Esch v. Smelser et al
as 1:2010cv02906
Petitioner:
William Richard Esch
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and Aristedes Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oliver v. Zavaras
as 1:2010cv02762
Petitioner:
Greggory Wade Oliver
Respondent:
Aristedes Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilmore v. Zavaras
as 1:2010cv02764
Plaintiff:
William Gilmore
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02725
Plaintiff:
Justin Rueb, Leroy Armijo, Rudy Ball and others
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Robert Allen, Eugene Atherton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02726
Plaintiff:
Justin Rueb and Jacob Oakley
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Eugene Atherton, Crandell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02727
Plaintiff:
Justin Rueb, Clifton Blecha, Raymond Cain and others
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Eugene Atherton, Dennis Burbank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02711
Plaintiff:
Keith Frazier
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Reed Bernt, Sandra Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. People of the State of Colorado et al
as 1:2010cv02677
Petitioner:
Leslie M. Wilson
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, Aristedes Zavaras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Effland v. People of the State of Colorado et al
as 1:2010cv02678
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, Aristedes Zavaras and others
Petitioner:
Philip D. Effland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coney v. Zavaras, et al
as 10-1492
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM SEAN CONEY
Respondent - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
