Cases 41 - 50 of 450
Safley v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08061
Petitioner:
Robert J Safley
Respondent:
David Shinn, Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bartels #336354 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00563
Petitioner:
Caleb Bartels
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wigent #351947 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv00508
Petitioner:
Alexander Bryson Wigent
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boucher #305556 v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2022cv08046
Petitioner:
Lawrence Emile Boucher
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Adel et al
as 2:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
Jay Cameron Thomas
Respondent:
Allister Adel, Maricopa, County of, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fierro v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv00153
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Tapia Fierro
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Villa v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Elias Ubaldo Villa
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
Stephen Bernard Young
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waldrep v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Roger Darryl Waldrep
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hussein v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2021cv02115
Petitioner:
Mustafa Nabeel Hussein
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
